Why Free Speec is important

Because Some people don’t like Firefly

It started with this picture:

The evil, violence inciting poster.

Which was taken down because obviously, helpless college students would tremble, undestanding that their professor was informing that their complaint would likely result in a gunfight on the quad.

So it was taken down due to the claim by the campus rep:

Speech can be limited on a reasonable expectation that it will cause a material and/or substantial disruption of school activities and/or be constituted as a threat. We were notified of the existence of the posting, reviewed it and believe that the wording on the poster can be interpreted as a threat by others and/or could cause those that view it to believe that you are willing/able to carry out actions similar to what is listed. This posting can cause others to fear for their safety, thus it was removed.

So another poster went up, this one somewhat more political in nature:

This was taken down, due to it’s threatening nature. Given that it’s threatening to Fascism, and the actions of the University staff, one coudl argue that it’s defended by the fact that it is the simple truth.

But in the never ending debate over free speech, this is an important incident to discus– a single ignorant, foolish official, backed up by the power of the university, is threatening a professor, and is refusing ot admit that she was utterly wrong.

And that’s why free speech, strong free speech is important– because you will not, whether on the right or left, be likely to face fair minded individuals who only use this power with reluctance. No, far more often it will be ignorant, small minded officials, who majored in Covering their Asses, and Shutting Up Debate.  That’s how it’s always gone, and that’s how it will always go. 

So remember , the next time someone wants laws outlawing hate speech, or incitement, or making it harder to demonstrate, just how small minded the people are– and how powerful a tool you’ll be putting in their hands.

And we gave them 600 BILLION?

Over the last three months, I have sent in insurance information into Chase bank to cover my mortgage…. eight times. Including several times by registered mail.

 

They have lost it, each and every time.  This isn’t even counting the other things, which because they might be the subject of a lawsuit, I can’t get into here.

 

But consider this, a bank, this vast driver of our economic engine, cannot even keep track of letters sent to them by registered mail, not once, but eight times.

Combine this with the robosigner “difficulties” (Mass fraud for you and me), the lost money, the lost records, etc, etc, it’s plain that the Mafia missed their calling. They should have become bankers– instead of Elliot Ness going after them, they would have been able to demand federal assistance in those hard economic times.

 

And who says the era of the mad scientist is over?

Certainly not I!

 

The HIV virus may be about to become a new weapon in the fight against cancer as initial tests have shown it can drastically minimize and even help cure the most common form of leukemia.

A research team, led by Dr. Carl June working out of the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, has been experimenting with using a harmless version of the HIV virus combined with genetically modified white blood cells as a new way to fight cancer. The cells are taken from patients and modified with new genes that make them target cancer cells, but just as importantly, they can also multiply once injected allowing them to scale up as a small army inside the body.

 

Don’t start writing the epitaph for Cancer just yet– this has a long, long way to go.  But even so, it’s an example as to why having an educated workforce, backing up a strong culture of R&D in all areas, is absolutely vital to the growth of a nation.

 

Downgrade madness

The Stock markets are falling, in the aftermath of S&P’s downgrade…and people are rushing to…

Treasury Bonds.

That’s pretty odd, given that the fears were originally a default on the part of the US, but there are two reasons for this, in my opinion.

 

1. The US is the only game in town.  The Euro is moribound with ever more bad news coming out of member nations.  It’s not just Greece any more, it’s Spain and Italy and nobody has a clue how far the contagion may go–or whether or not the more healthy members, such as Germany will continue to support the unhealthy members. Not being able to pay because congress is acting like a bunch of five year olds is bad– but better then not being able to pay because you have no money in the bank.

2.  Our debt isn’t that bad.

Contrary to the tea party hysteria, the US debt isn’t that bad– letting the Bush tax cuts expire would go a long way towards fixing it, and that would still leave us far below or traditional tax rates, even when you consider how bad they were under such noted Commies, as Ike and Nixon. In other words, and this is related to 1. it’s not that the US doesn’t have the ability to deal with the debt, it’s that we currently don’t have the will.  But the Market is, I believe considering the fact that at this point, if crunch time hits, we can deal with our debt problems and thus a real, as opposed to political, default remains outside of the realm of probability.

 

Oh, there’s another point– if the US collapses, the entire global economy goes down with us– so it’s also likely that investors realize that if the US bond market collapses, it’s not like the money you’re losing will mean anything.

 

Anonymous and scoring an “own goal” in the fight over internet freedom.

Well, Anonymous has done it again:

Nestled within the data dump, posted as both a BitTorrent release and posted on sites accessible via the Tor anonymity network, are more than 300 different email accounts from 56 law enforcement websites. Details from the ransacked Missouri Sherriff’s Association website also appear in the release, including user names and passwords as well as users’ home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers – a move that’s sure to infuriate law enforcement officials even before they note the actual name of the hackers’ release, “Shooting Sheriffs Saturday.”

Also found within the release are various police training files, a list of users who have submitted information to an online “anonymous” crime tip system, and various server-related information and login credentials.

“We have no sympathy for any of the officers or informants who may be endangered by the release of their personal information. For too long they have been using and abusing our personal information, spying on us, arresting us, beating us, and thinking that they can get away with oppressing us in secrecy,” reads the hackers’ Pastebin-posted manifesto. “Well it’s retribution time: we want them to experience just a taste of the kind of misery and suffering they inflict upon us on an everyday basis.”

Like a band of poo flinging monkeys, they once again cheer their ability to strike at that man.

Forgetting that the Man has guns.  Much like the Anarchist bombers of the 19th century managed to drastically harm the very goals they claimed to be fighting for, what Anonymous has done is nothing less than provide those pointing to the fact that the internet needs more, not less control with concrete examples as to why they’re right.  We’ve already seen, in Bahrain, and other nations that yes, it’s possible for a national government to make fairly big strides to restricting the internet.

The biggest barrier, in fact is not technological, but social and political– our own courts have routinely struck down laws seen as too restrictive and the population itself remains hostile to the idea, at least in general. But releasing the names and identities of police?  Potentially endangering tipsters?

That’s a great way to lose this war, especially if there’s no incriminating material as part of the dump– people were willing to accept that a “Technical” violation occured in the release of the Abu Ghraib photo’s because it was plain that the acts being photographed were illegal, violations of both civil law and the UCMJ which those witnessing were obligated to report.  But this, if it’s just the identifying information of police, absent any other information, or criminal files with identifying information of suspects or witnesses, this will have no such defense. What it will do is to back the hand of those arguing that the internet is now as vital as any public utility and that groups like Anonymous must now be treated like terrorists, bringing the full weight of governmental power to bear on them– and that as a part of that, the internet itself must be more strictly regulated.

Such would require great effort– which to date has been an advantage, but the more acts like this, the more the real powers– the corporations and govenrments that actually make the internet work, will start to decide that the extra cost is worth the security.  And worse, so will the people, who rather than hearing about genuine abuses of government authority brought down by hackers, will see cases of latter day infants throwing temper tantrums because some of their associates were put in prison. That does not produce a sense of injustice on the part of the bystanders, merely a hope that the government has enough cells for all.

Anonymous is not the friend of internet freedom– Anonymous is the enemy and its members are working very hard to strengthen the hand of those who wish to end internet freedom.

Why taking the 14th won’t help our debt crisis.

Well, today was the day, by some accounts that was the deadline for getting our debt crisis fixed. After all, it’s not enough to pass a bill, you have to do everything that is needed to bring it down to having a practical impact.

And that isn’t going to happen.

So now, presuming no moves of compromise, a new hope is that President Obama will “take the 14th” and unilaterally raise the ceiling.

The justification for this can be found here:

Some analysts say no — Obama can simply order the Treasury to pay its bills even if Congress refuses to raise the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling.

“Preventing default is no less justified than using American military power to protect against an armed invasion without a congressional declaration of war,” Bruce Bartlett writes in Fiscal Times.

Like others, Bartlett cites a section of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that says, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law … shall not be questioned.”

“This could easily justify the sort of extraordinary presidential action to avoid default that I am suggesting,” Bartlett writes.

So, the president orders, and thus, everything works fine, right?

Wrong.  There are two problems with this.

1. There is no real certainty that the 14th amendment would be held to give the executive that sort of wide ranging authority.  This would be a major constitutional crisis, easily on a par with any that have come before, calling into question the separation of powers within the United States government. Some Republicans have already threatened to initiate impeachment proceedings should the president do so, and while we can’t be certain how it would turn out, we can be certain that the federal government would be paralyzed…and would you loan money to a group that might not be in power to repay you?

2.  Bond ratings aren’t simply about ability to pay, they’re about the stability of the government in question.  Third world nations aren’t simply bad risks because they don’t have any money– they’re bad risks because your money may become their money if there is a shift in power.  With a government in disarray with the executive being forced to use powers that have never been tested in the court system and congress quite possibly launching (however doomed to failure) impeachment proceedings, even a blind man would be able to see that our government is not stable, and more importantly, the question of who got paid and how might very well depend on who won the political battle.

In other words, welcome to the united states of Third Worldia.

There is no solution to this other than a debt ceiling deal, in congress.  Clever tricks won’t help, because they will, if anything, make the instability worse.  Fundamentally, the Washington political situation is at a stalemate not seen since the 1930’s, and until that is resolved, don’t be surprised if bond agencies rate us as a bad risk.

The real danger of the debt ceiling fight.

It’s not a real default, but a political default.

It’s important to note that nobody believes we can’t pay. This isn’t like Greece’s economic troubles, or a case where some disaster ended our ability to physically make good on our debts.

Some would say that’s good– there’s little chance the markets will react poorly since they know that sooner or later, we can, and likely will, pay our debts.

That is completely incorrect. The fact that this potential default isn’t involuntary, but a process of our political dysfunction makes things worse, not better.  The first point is to remember that bonds, currency, our entire economic structure infact, is backed by confidence, not anything physical.  You accept dollars because the government says they’re legal tender– and because we trust the government to insure that they’re honored. Nations where this doesn’t happen suffer people either not using the currency at all, using a currency that inflates as its value drops.

The system is a trust based system, and the fact that the United States has never defaulted is what keeps the trust up. You invest in Bonds because you know, that unlike the bank of developing-world-land, you won’t find out one day that the nation has decided to nationalize your investments, or simply won’t honor them because the new occupant of the capitol says not to.

And this trust is based in large part on the assumption that the self interest of the United States will trump political manuevering.

But, and this is the dangerous part, if it doesn’t get fixed, if we hit August 2, then that assumption will be proven false– it will prove that in fact the political system in the US is so dysfunctional that self interest no longer trumps politics.

And just as a person who lies once is never fully trusted again, the question on every investors lips will be: “what if this happens again?”  Instead of being a rock solid gurentee, US debt, like many other nations, will become a dangerous investment, where the fear of default is always present.  Yes, you could say it will never happen again– but until now, people were saying there was no chance– not one, of it happening at all. Ask any investment broker and he’ll tell you that political instability is a big part of decisions to not invest in a region– and political instability doesn’t just mean “factions shooting at each other” it also covers political systems that simply can’t make vital decisions, which is what we have here.

And then of course there’s the emotional consequences– the people of the world, if a US political tussle plunges them into a recession, won’t be very eager to trust, or forgive us again.  The fall out from such a default will extend to every form of investment in the United States public and private sector.

And remember, this is, in some political corners, by choice.

We need to remember that, because if we don’t fix this, you can bet your ass that the rest of the world will remember it.